
The cover interpellates the reader by understanding and addressing some questions and curiosity of many women, both spoken and unspoken. For example, during the early 1990s we began to see low-fat, chemically-filled versions of our favorite foods cropping up all over our supermarkets. Allure capitalizes on this by claiming to give their readers the inside scoop on which ones to buy. On a deeper level, this still promotes the idea that if you are going to be eating, it should be low-fat because full-fat translates into a fat body, and a fat body isn’t a beautiful one. Also, in terms of vitamins, they were also gaining popularity during the early 1990s. Instead of addressing vitamins in terms of their nutritional and well-ness functions of health, they choose “magic or myth” connoting that the actual properties of vitamins may have the ability to magically rid women of some of their physically issues, thus making them more ‘beautiful.’ Humorously, you’ll probably need those vitamins because you’ll be robbed of the natural ones from all of the olestra and aspartame-filled, low-fat snacks you’re munching. Also, “Skin Care: The Only 3 Products You Need” is problematic. First, obviously they draw on the fact that readers ‘need’ certain skincare products, and by not purchasing or being aware of them the readers are not well informed and cannot be beautiful. They also touch upon frugality and being economically savvy by claiming that there are only 3 products women need. However, what they leave out is the purpose of the 3 items. Perhaps they are only 3 products women need to prevent eye wrinkles, or 3 products women need to prep their skin before applying their make up. The magazine draws the women in by claiming to simplify their regimen, however I bet the article gives many more examples of products than the cover claims. The more products they endorse, the more money the make. Finally, for the old-wives tale headline, the magazine hints at the fact that perhaps there is some truth to the wisdom of generations past, and that the newer the idea the better it is. What the cover doesn’t say is that the even though ‘mom was right’ there are now new and improved products that stem from these ideas for you to buy.

Lastly, Kate Moss appears on the May cover lounging in a black slip dress with the text “A User’s Guide to Slip Dresses.” It is interesting that now, if Kate Moss or any other recognizable celebrity was on the cover, they would print their name and claim to have exclusive information pertaining to them gathered from an interview. However, as recently as fifteen years ago, the image on the magazine cover is used to sell an item within the magazine (the slip dress) rather than the magazine itself as a result of the celebrity pictured.
No comments:
Post a Comment